It is highly irresponsible to consider the concept of assisted suicide, but not add thoughts of assisted suicide pros and cons to the conversation.
Assisted suicide is an extremely complex concept. For many, the answer to the question of whether or not assisted suicide should be a legal practice is clear. If a terminally ill person has the mental and emotional capacity to decide that they wish to end their life, they should be allowed to do so. For others, the answer to the question is also clear. Assisted suicide is morally reprehensible. Even if a person is in control of whether or not they can take their own life, they should not have the legal means to do so, nor should doctors be allowed to assist them in the process.
What is the right answer? Is assisted suicide a concept that should have the weight of the law in its corner?
The truth of the matter is that there is no easy answer to this question. You cannot simply tell a person how they should feel about the issue. It’s important that any individual who wants to make a decision regarding the legal/moral implications of assisted suicide do so, but only after they have weighed assisted suicide pros and cons very carefully.
In the deeply personal realm of assisted suicide, there is perhaps no name more closely or famously associated with than that of Dr. Jack Kevorkian. It was Kevorkian, who served a lengthy prison sentence for his beliefs on the subject, who argued that if a person had a rational desire to end their untreatable pain, then they should be allowed to do so. To that end, he invented and later perfected a device that was designed to allow people to end their lives, should that be what they wanted.
3. Planning is easier: With a disease such as terminal cancer, regardless of the specific type, there is no set timeline. Doctors can guess, but a patient can potentially live a longer or shorter period of time beyond that diagnosis. And while no one likes to think about final arrangements, it is still something that needs to be considered. When the disease is in control, planning final arrangements can be difficult. When the individual is in control, final arrangements is a concept that is easier to grasp.
4. A person is able to reduce the pain they feel. As many diseases progress, the amount of agony a person feels increases exponentially. Assisted suicide can naturally end that pain.
1. It conflicts with certain religious beliefs. For those who have strong spiritual beliefs, suicide is suicide. It doesn’t matter if the person is experiencing blinding pain. Suicide is believed to be a practice that goes against the plans of the creator figure in a person’s religion, whether a doctor assists in the process or not.
2. It is morally unethical. Even those who do not have definable religious beliefs have made the argument that assisted suicide is wrong. They’re reasons for doing so can vary, but for many, it’s simply an inability to separate suicide in a general sense, from suicide that has been managed by a health professional.
3. It doesn’t always go according to plan, which can lead to a variety of consequences. Even if a person follows the directions of the process, something can still go wrong. This can have both physical and psychological consequences.
4. There is a social stigma. The social stigma for assisted suicide has its origins in the stigma surrounding suicide in a general sense.